In 2003, two
geophysical surveys were conducted at this property; an Electromagnetic (EM)
survey and a Magnetic (MAG) survey. The EM survey showed two clusters of single
point anomalies in the front yard. A "possible pit" feature was seen
on the MAG survey, but not on the EM survey. Although there may be some error
in the aerial photograph from 1918, the location of the "possible pit" feature
shown in the MAG survey very closely matches the location of a "possible
pit" ground scar on the 1918 map, causing this area to be of more interest
to the Army Corps ... The MAG survey can be more sensitive, and can scan deeper
into the ground. Anomalies do not show up on an EM survey if they are buried
very deep. So there might be a disposal pit full of World War I bombs made
out of metal, which could be an explanation as to why the anomalies show up in
the MAG Survey but not in the EM survey ...
USACE went back
to the property in March. The large anomaly was intrusively investigated in two
locations ... Once these holes were excavated to four feet, the geophysical
instruments were inserted into the holes. The instruments did not detect a
signal at the bottom of either hole. When the instruments were brought up the
side of the hole near the surface, the signal returned. The conclusion is that
something about the soil structure in this area causes a magnetic signature.
The signal happens near surface, in the first foot or two. However, there were
no more magnetic signals at the bottom of the holes. USACE [now] believes that
this large anomalous area, which was designated as POI 2, is due to what is
referred to as “hot soil” or “hot rocks,” not buried metal.
No comments:
Post a Comment